S1
Jesús Duque Arimany / Museos de Tenerife
Opening nine-territory discussion; Paragraphs En cualquier caso and Sin ir más lejos
Source and interpretation notes
Full relevant institutional web text read on2026-10-22
- Modern historical synthesis; territorial reconstruction is approximate.
- Existence of territories is distinct from certainty about every royal genealogy.
S2
Zebensui López Trujillo; reviewed by Antonio Tejera Gaspar and Francisco García Talavera; Gobierno de Canarias digital edition,2020
PDF11, Organización territorial y política; PDF14, Ganadería
Source and interpretation notes
Original published PDF downloaded and text extracted; complete PDF11 visually inspected; PDF14 pastoral text inspected
- Government educational synthesis, not contemporary record.
- La Gomera alliance sentence is internally unclear and excluded.
- No exact preconquest territorial border, royal pedigree or Jandía border adopted.
S3
Zebensui López Trujillo; reviewed by Roberto J.González Zacalaín; Gobierno de Canarias digital edition,2020
PDF9, Incorporación de La Gomera; PDF16, Datas de Repartimiento; PDF20, Caña de azúcar and Ganadería y pesca; PDF24 glossary, Data
Source and interpretation notes
Original published PDF downloaded and extracted; complete PDF9,16,20 rendered and visually inspected
- Educational synthesis; no original1488 record newly read.
- No exact victim count; no claim Juan held sugar estate.
- Market connections are general, not proved family voyages.
S4
José Antonio González Marrero
Printed18/PDF17,18September1501 grant; Printed19/PDF18,22January1501 grant; Printed20/PDF19,12September1540 lease; Printed20/PDF19,19November1549 and13March1550 testament summaries; Printed21/PDF20, Antonia follow-on
Source and interpretation notes
Held published PDF freshly extracted, printed18–23/PDF17–22; complete printed18–20/PDF17–19 visually reread on2026-10-22
- Published transcriptions and the author’s summaries; no original grant, lease or will manuscripts newly inspected.
- Tradition of Juan’s Autindana parentage is excluded.
- Joint1501 grant; no fixed equal shares, exact spring coordinates or hectare conversion.
- Will dates do not establish death dates or fulfillment of burial wishes.
- 1549 plot identity with prior neighboring plot is an explicit author inference, excluded.
- Antonia is not joined to Luisa’s household.
- Source’s1555February29 date elsewhere is impossible and not used.
S5
Real Academia Española / Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española
fanega de puño / fanega de sembradura; fanega de tierra
Source and interpretation notes
Definition page read on2026-10-22
- Definition explains sowing-based land measure and variation; no modern conversion applied to this1501 grant.
S6
Elías Serra Ráfols, editor; Instituto de Estudios Canarios,1949; second edition1996
25November1502, entries286–291; Printed51–52; manuscript folios37r–37v as indicated by edition
Source and interpretation notes
Published volume downloaded, extracted; complete printed51–52/PDF84–85 rendered and visually read on2026-10-22
- Published transcription, not original council manuscript.
- Robbery allegation is the council’s language, not an independent finding by the film.
- Agreement and conditional release do not prove subsequent capture operation or outcome.
- Don Pedro’s guilt not established; Juan Dara absent from named participants.
S7
Gobierno de Canarias, Portal de Transparencia
Prehistoria, paragraph on distinct cultures; Conquista/colonización, paragraphs on realengo/señorío, cabildos and privilege
Source and interpretation notes
Relevant full institutional text read on2026-10-22
- Broad synthesis, no single centralized Canarian authority asserted.
- Imperial economy is editorial explanation built from stated mechanisms, not legal classification quoted from source.
S8
Cabildo Insular de Gran Canaria; Boletín Oficial de Canarias045/664,6March2023
Anexo: Contexto Histórico; Anexo: Descripción, pilastras, acequia and wheel position; Anexo: Justificación, forced labor and African trafficking
Source and interpretation notes
Published institutional HTML annex read in full relevant sections on2026-10-22; HTML is not the signed official PDF
- Used for archaeological/historical account, not legal advice or current BIC status.
- Water/mill structure is Los Picachos in Gran Canaria, not Juan’s property.
- No named family member attributed sugar ownership or slaveholding.
S9
Royal Museums Greenwich / National Maritime Museum, Caird Collection
Object details: circa1540; Central foreground armed merchant carrack and gun salute paragraphs
Source and interpretation notes
Museum catalogue inspected, including date, ship types, salute and debated voyage identification
- Painting is period shipping context; voyage identity debated.
- Not a Canary harbor identification, a1553attack, or Juan’s crossing.
- Image acquisition, exact asset rights and crop validation belong to visual manifest.
Maps
Modern explanatory maps
Source and interpretation notes
Geographic and historical-context graphics resolved by root; each must retain modern/approximate labeling
- No invented shipping itinerary, spring pin, parcels or troop movements.
SeriesPlan
Parts4and5: approved combined25-minute plan,22October2026
Source and interpretation notes
Editorial continuity and next-episode preview, not independent historical proof
Editorial
Original film commentary
Source and interpretation notes
Modern authored transition or humor; never historical dialogue
Credits
Production credits
Source and interpretation notes
Root resolves final soundtrack and visual credits